In the dynamic between grantmakers and nonprofits, honesty can sometimes be elusive, especially from the nonprofits' perspective. Many feel beholden to grantmakers, striving to present themselves as worthy of funding, which can hinder genuine dialogue. This cautious approach stems from a fear of misalignment with grantmakers' self-perceptions and their envisioned role within the community. Such an imbalance often reflects the grantmakers' preferences rather than the actual impact of the nonprofits' work.
Nonprofits tend to tread carefully, aiming to cast themselves in a favorable light to enhance their funding prospects. However, this isn't the ideal foundation for a relationship between grantmakers and nonprofits. Grantmakers should value and seek to understand the work and insights of nonprofits, especially if their efforts are proven impactful. Rather than dictating terms, grantmakers should engage with nonprofits to learn about their work and its community impact.
Often, grantmakers employ consultants for feasibility studies or strategic planning, which can significantly influence their decisions and directions. While these consultants provide valuable insights, their role should also involve equitable engagement with both large and small nonprofits, acting as a conduit for a deeper understanding of on-the-ground efforts and fostering stronger, more inclusive relationships.
Transparency and honesty from all parties during information gathering are crucial. Nonprofits should feel free to share their experiences and perspectives without fear of repercussion. Conversely, grantmakers should welcome feedback, even if it casts them in a less favorable light, viewing it as an opportunity to bridge gaps and build stronger connections with those making a tangible impact. Only through mutual honesty and receptiveness can grantmakers and nonprofits form alliances that prioritize impactful work and positive community transformation.